Raising funds for new ventures has taken on fresh forms in recent years. One approach involves offering something new to the public in exchange for support, often with the promise of future use or value. While this method opened doors for many creators and innovators, it also raised concerns among those who oversee monetary activities. As rules and expectations became clearer, the approach evolved, offering both opportunities and challenges for those looking to bring new ideas to life.
An ICO is a modern way for startups—especially those in the virtual ledger or online currency space—to raise money. Instead of going to banks or venture capitalists, these companies create digital tokens and sell them to early supporters.
Buyers hand over real money in exchange for these tokens. Depending on the project, the tokens might unlock access to a future product, offering, or platform feature. This approach is especially popular in the open-source world, where traditional funding can be hard to come by.
Before launching an ICO, most teams release a white paper—basically a detailed document that lays out what the project is about and how they plan to build it.
This usually encompasses:
The white paper is crucial because it’s often the only real way for backers to judge whether a project has potential—or is just hype.
It’s tempting to compare ICOs with IPOs, but they’re actually very different.
When a company does an IPO, it has to enroll with regulators like the SEC. The process involves detailed financial reports, formal filings, audits, and guidance from investment banks. There’s a lot of oversight, which gives investors a clearer picture of what they’re buying into.
ICOs, on the other hand, operate in a much grayer area. In the U.S., they’re only regulated if the tokens are considered securities. If the tokens are just meant for future use, they may not fall under existing rules. This can make it harder for everyday investors to tell which projects are legit—and which might not be.
An ICO is a way for new blockchain-based startups to collect funding. Instead of turning to traditional backers or banks, these companies create and distribute digital tokens over a digital ledger. Supporters who contribute money to the project receive these tokens in return.
These can be bought, sold, and traded like other online assets. Their purpose can vary widely. How a token is classified depends on its use, typically falling into one of two categories: utility tokens or security ones.
These are essentially access passes to a service the company is planning to offer in the future. Sometimes referred to as “app coins” or “user tokens,” these do not represent ownership in a firm. Instead, they function more like digital gift cards or pre-orders for a product that hasn’t launched yet.
Startups often use these tokens to raise funds during development. Since utility tokens aren’t meant to represent an investment or a claim on future profits, they often fall outside strict laws—so long as they’re carefully structured.
A well-known example is Filecoin, which raised over $250 million by offering tokens that let users access its decentralized cloud storage network. To avoid drawing attention from regulators, some companies now describe these offerings with various terms like “token distribution event” instead of “ICO.”
These behave much more like conventional investments. If a token’s value is tied to a tradable asset or depends on a company’s future performance, it likely falls under securities regulations. In such cases, companies must abide by strict monetary laws, or they risk heavy fines and possible shutdown.
Once properly regulated, they open up new possibilities. Companies can issue tokens that act like shares in a business. A notable case is Overstock.com, which launched a digital token via its subsidiary tZERO. These tokens abide by SEC rules, and investors receive quarterly dividends based on tZERO’s profits.
Experts in the field believe that one day, major companies could issue stock through blockchain-based tokens.
Joichi Ito, a respected voice in the tech world, has expressed strong concerns about the explosive rise of ICOs. He warns that the hype surrounding digital currencies is leading to reckless behavior in the industry.
He fears that while traditional IPOs are heavily regulated, ICOs have operated in a gray area—leaving everyday investors vulnerable. Many token buyers may not fully comprehend what they’re investing in, or whether the project is even viable. According to Ito, smarter and more technically aware regulation is urgently needed.
In the meantime, as stories of fast profits from Bitcoin and ICOs continue to spread, more people are likely to jump in without fully understanding the potential risks. Without proper oversight, this could lead to major financial losses for some backers and long-term harm to the blockchain ecosystem.
Eventually, this modern method of raising funds offers both promise and pitfalls. It allows creative ventures to gain support outside traditional systems, but it also brings uncertainty due to loose oversight. As the space continues to grow and adapt, clearer rules and better understanding will be key to ensuring that innovation is balanced with responsibility.