During decades, Switzerland has been considered a reliable safe haven for entrepreneurs. Its stable and mature economy is a major attraction for both financiers and those seeking predictability, just like the governance. That being said, as markets change somewhat, so does the core question – which legal framework is best suited to carry your venture forward? The structure chosen impacts accountability and tax exposure; managerial duties at various levels of control – however minimal or critical they might be in practice; and even how prospective clients or colleagues view what’s being done as part of a project.
Of all variants available, such form is the most straightforward. This’s where commercial activities are pursued in an individual’s own right and under the individual’s name.
This setup is quick to start and easy to keep informal. Without a means for protecting personal assets, it carries great risks, nevertheless. This is why outside capital rarely deigns to become involved in mountain building or wood carving, for instance, because the entity has no clear legal identity.
When 2-2+ people act in concert, partnership models appear.
Combines general partners who take full responsibility with limited ones whose liabilities are confined to their investment.
It lends itself to slight modifications yet affords less than full shelter under company law. Such schemes are highly effective within tight professional circles and families where longstanding relationships guarantee trust. The snag is that someone along the line always remains fully liable to creditors.
In eyes of smaller and medium-sized business-structures, the Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH) or Société à responsabilité limitée (Sà rl) is the popular middle road.
This formula retains transparency without the heavier compliance obligations demanded of bigger organizations. For many founders, GmbH is just the right compromise between inanimate protection and social flexibility.
Aktiengesellschaft (AG) or Société Anonyme (SA) is the traditional form of an outfit for larger enterprises and is popular when international expansions are envisaged.
This vehicle enjoys a high degree of prestige and is very much sought after by international investors. Nonetheless, it costs more, and the red tape is thicker.
For many international groups, it is preferable to establish a Swiss branch than to set up an independent Swiss legal entity.
In this way, one is able to test the Swiss market without actually going into full incorporation.
Though most often associated with nonprofit activities, the Verein can also provide a home base for professional guilds or creative amalgamations.
When you are picking the right structure, a number of things must be considered.
Picking a structure is not the end-all and be-all; it is like a compass, directing entrepreneurs toward one that meets their financial needs, tolerance of exposure, and long-term goals.
Swiss corporate law is constantly undergoing changes to attract transnational businesses. And among these, it charges its share capital regulations so changeably that conventioneers may find digital startups yet still call-up setups in all corners of the globe – goes into its second year with digital incorporation channels and updated governance requirements. These reforms are both dirt for Switzerland as an impregnable fortress of finance and fertile ground where inventive enterprises can grow.
Charting a path through the Swiss legal maze requires informed help. Our advisory practice is there to support you by:
Using our expertise, you’ll confidently set your feet upon the soil of Switzerland and set a course for even-headed profits.